1999 Dry Field Pea
Forage Production
Central Agricultural Research Center
![]()
Project Personnel
D.M. Wichman, Agronomist,
Moccasin, MT
K.E. Neill, Research Associate, CARC, Moccasin, MT
L. Welty, Agronomist, NWARC, Creston, MT
M. Westcott,
Agronomist, WARC, Corvallis, MT
Objectives
To evaluate variety forage yield performance in pure stands and with a cereal forage crop (Haybet hay barley) under different cropping and environmental conditions in Montana.
Methods
In
the 1999 Uniform Pea Forage Trial (UPFT),
four Austrian winter pea varieties, along with Trapper (a small yellow
forage pea) and Arvika (a maple forage pea), were evaluated for forage
potential in pure stands and mixed with Haybet hay barley. The trial was
seeded at one dryland site (Moccasin), an irrigated site (Corvallis) and a
high-rainfall site (Creston). Moccasin
- The trial was successfully seeded on May 5, 1999, no-till into
winter wheat stubble in field NE3-W. A pre-plant Quizalofop (Assure II) was
applied at 8 oz per acre. Due to drill limitations, no innoculant was
applied to the peas. Nitrogen (N) was applied post-emergence in two
applications, with a total of 90 pounds of N applied in the form of
ammonium-nitrate (NH4NO3) on June 16th and
22nd. The nursery was not rolled. The site was harvested when the
barley had reached the milk to soft dough stage (August 2, 1999). Production
methods for Creston and
Corvallis are reported under Table
41.
Results and
Discussion
Moccasin
Poor stands were observed and are believed to be a
result of poor nitrogen (N) management. During seeding drill plugging
problems were encountered with peat-based inoculant used on peas. Therefore,
no inoculant was placed with the seed and inclement weather forced a late
seeding dates and a late application of N on the nursery. Consequently, an N
deficiency and lowered forage yields were observed. Haybet hay barley was
the top forage producer (Table 38) of the
nursery. Sioux Austrian winter pea mixed with Haybet barley was the best
pea/cereal mix combination producing just under 2,500 pounds per acre.
Melrose Austrian winter pea had the best pure stand forge yield. Overall,
peas seeded alone had significantly less forage production then peas mixed
with Haybet (Table 39).
However, when compared directly with each variety, both Sioux and Wahlechia
Austrian winter peas mixed with Haybet had significantly higher forage
yields over their respective pure pea stands (Table
40).
Creston
Excellent seedling emergence was reported at
Creston. Arvika mixed with Haybet had the top forage production (Table
41). Arvika maple peas had the best pea dry matter yield.
Corvallis
Trapper yellow peas mixed with Haybet had the top
forage production at Corvallis (Table
41).
A multi-location
summary for the 1999 Uniform Pea Forage Trial can be found in Table
42.
Future Research
Plans include
a closer evaluation of pea/cereal forage mix seeding techniques (timing,
methods, rates, etc.) on forage yield and seedling vigor. The question of
N-fertilizer requirements and the need for pea inoculant will also be
evaluated.
Table 42. Multi-location pea forage summary; 1999 Uniform Pea Forage Trial (UPFT).1/
- Exp. 998700. Central Agricultural Research Center, Moccasin, MT.
|
|
|
Moccasin |
Corvallis |
Creston |
|||
|
Id |
Variety |
Stand |
Yield |
Stand |
Yield |
Yield |
|
|
|
|
(%) |
(tons/ac) |
(%) |
(tons/ac) |
(tons/ac) |
|
|
PFT99001 |
Haybet
Barley |
73.80 |
1.32 |
97.5 |
4.07 |
4.86 |
|
|
PFT98007 |
Arvika |
99.42 |
1.05 |
98.8 |
2.13 |
2.63 |
|
|
PFT99002 |
Arvika/Haybet |
81.75 |
1.22 |
97.5 |
4.16 |
4.84 |
|
|
PGT98004 |
Trapper |
48.45 |
0.91 |
91.3 |
1.67 |
1.91 |
|
|
PFT99003 |
Trapper/Haybet |
68.30 |
1.02 |
93.8 |
3.50 |
5.37 |
|
|
PFT98002 |
Granger |
81.78 |
1.07 |
95.0 |
1.83 |
2.22 |
|
|
PFT99004 |
Granger/Haybet |
82.38 |
1.14 |
97.5 |
4.02 |
4.13 |
|
|
PFT98001 |
Melrose |
100.00 |
1.08 |
95.0 |
1.66 |
2.15 |
|
|
PFT99005 |
Melrose/Haybet |
87.17 |
1.12 |
95.0 |
3.72 |
4.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experimental
Means |
|
82.39 |
1.07 |
95.7 |
2.97 |
3.52 |
|
|
LSD
(0.05 by t) |
|
17.62 |
0.24 |
3.9 |
0.86 |
0.67 |
|
|
C.V.
(S/Mean) x 100% |
|
14.9 |
15.6 |
2.8 |
15.9 |
---- |
|
1/ - Did not evaluate Wahlechia or Sioux Austrian winter pea
![]()